For the past five years, Seattle police have operated under a federal consent decree that requires steps to be taken to reduce biased policing. United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions wants to review Obama-era consent decrees to see if they should remain in place. But the review is unlikely to change the one in Seattle.
After several high profile incidents in Seattle, including the killing of Native American woodcarver John T. Williams by a Seattle police officer, the U.S. Department of Justice investigated and found a pattern of biased policing and unnecessary use of force in the city.
Seattle signed a consent decree in 2012 and a federal judge is now overseeing the reform efforts. Ultimately it will be up to the federal judge, Judge James Robart, the same judge who put President Trump's initial travel ban on hold, to decide when the city has done enough.
And it’s for this reason that Attorney General Jeff Sessions will not be able to unilaterally change or rescind the agreement. According to the consent decree, all the parties have to agree to any changes and the court has to sign off on it.
But Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes is concerned that, even with the consent decree in place, the Justice Department will cut back on its collaborative efforts.
"It’s been less of a true adversarial relationship as we’ve progressed with reform and I’ll be sad to see that come to an end,” he said.
On the other hand, he says Sessions' memo refers to the need to protect both “public safety and officer safety" and that's something Holmes agrees with.
In a press release issued Tuesday afternoon, Mayor Ed Murray and Police Chief Kathleen O'Toole expressed concern about Session's plan to review police reform plans.
"Our progress under the consent decree cannot be undone by empty bureaucratic threats," said Murray.
O'Toole said, "We remain committed to constitutional and effective policing in our city."